IT
Repository dispute

The provincial council and the assembly of mayors of Viterbo, convened by the province, approved unanimously the findings of studies and technical analyses on the planned national radioactive waste repository. Forza Italia's Montalto di Castro and Pescia Romana branch said the findings effectively reject the project as designed.

The branch said it followed the mayors' assembly online. It welcomed an announcement by province president Alessandro Romoli to hold a public assembly with associations, committees and citizens, and thanked him for coordinating the mayors. It also noted a plan, announced with provincial councillor Andrea Di Sorte, to organise a public meeting to present the study findings.

Forza Italia said its municipality had followed the issue directly since 2021, adopting a unanimous municipal council motion, preparing observations and holding public discussions. It said engineer Massimo Gobbi was among the technicians who worked with it and is again involved with the province. The mayor of Montalto di Castro attended the mayors' assembly and voted, expressing a wish to continue protecting the territory, the branch said. It said the unanimous vote was an important step but should not be an endpoint.

Why it matters
Local bodies in Viterbo have formally backed findings that reject Italy's planned national radioactive waste repository as designed, deepening the siting dispute.

The story so far — Asse

  1. July 30, 2026 NRC Weighs 20-Year Renewal of Crow Butte Uranium Recovery License
  2. August 20, 2026 Finland's Onkalo Repository Passes Key Safety Ruling
  3. September 21, 2026 Chinon A2 heat exchanger dismantling strategy validated
  4. September 22, 2026 Viterbo mayors back studies rejecting national radioactive waste repository plan this story
  5. October 1, 2026 Hinkley Point B passes from EDF to UK decommissioning body
  6. October 2, 2026 Somerset AGR Hinkley Point B passes to NRS for dismantling
Original Google News — 이탈리아 (it) news.google.com
Read the original

This article was generated by an automated RADWASTE pipeline from the cited public source and checked by a separate machine pass against that source text. It does not replace the original; verify every fact against the linked source.